When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only accomplished if the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The main objectives of police should be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and previously mentioned all guarantee legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
If your DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by possibly party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and commence according into the law. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Generally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (such as Those people in obvious violation of proven case law) into the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, along with the case is not appealed, the decision will stand.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as set forth would not use, since the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, relatively he continues to be acquitted from the criminal charges based on evidence and it is actually well-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted inside the criminal case, then on this really charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment through the department and held him disqualified to the post because acquittal for all foreseeable future purposes. The aforesaid proposition has actually been established at naught with the Supreme Court of Pakistan from the case of your District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
Generally speaking, higher courts don't have direct oversight over the lower courts of record, in that they cannot access out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the lessen courts.
From the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court would be the highest court within the United States. Lower courts about the federal level consist of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related towards the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that contain parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each and every state has its own judicial system that involves trial and appellate courts. The highest court in each state is often referred to as being the “supreme” court, Even though there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the New York Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Though state courts could also generally hear cases involving federal laws.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents in the boy or Female usually do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they can do if they could cut off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by regulation.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's very well-settled that whilst looking at the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to look at the advantage of all of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of suitable candidates who are found being most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded via the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of the respondent department.
The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called law of necessity..
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are definitely the opinions that are filed over the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and are sometimes not the court's final opinion.
Any court could seek to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to succeed in a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Summaries supply a condensed overview of offences and their penalties, along here with the procedural areas of prosecuting and punishing individuals accused of committing crimes.